The
recent military clashes between Israeli, Iranian and Syrian forces have
injected new volatility into an already explosive Middle East,
increasing the likelihood of miscalculation and escalatory military
action across the region.
As
the Syrian civil war grinds on, the pressing concern is not an all-out
war between Israel and a Syria whose military has been substantially
depleted.
Instead,
the real flashpoints are the potential for a permanent Iranian military
presence in Syria and the transfer of precision-guided advanced weapons
to Lebanese Hezbollah, both of which are stated redlines for Israel.
One
Israeli F-16I fighter was shot down during the strike, and Israel’s
retaliation was swift and severe. It launched two waves of strikes,
hitting Syrian air bases, air defense units, command and control
facilities and Iranian targets.
The
Israeli government has been clear that permanent Iranian bases in
Syria, Iranian and Hezbollah forces on its northern border, the transfer
of advanced weapons to Hezbollah and missile production facilities in
Lebanon are unacceptable.
The
Netanyahu government has indicated it is not seeking further escalation
or a broader conflict, but has warned Iran that it will defend its sovereignty.
The attacks were clearly meant as a warning not only to Iran, but also
to Syrian President Bashar al Assad, who is hosting Iranian and
Hezbollah forces on Syrian territory.
Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corps personnel—including a special operations unit
known as the Quds Force—Lebanese Hezbollah and Shia militia fighters
are all operating in Syria, bolstering the Assad regime.
Israel
has largely attempted to avoid getting entangled in the Syrian civil
war, but both Iran and Hezbollah’s presence in Syria and Hezbollah’s
acquisition of advanced weaponry, potentially including a nascent
precision strike capability, present a new and significant threat.
Indeed, Israel estimates Hezbollah has up to 150,000 rockets and missiles
; a precision targeting capability would be a game changer, allowing
Hezbollah to hold vital Israeli infrastructure and population centers at
risk with far fewer weapons due to increased accuracy.
Of
note, during this latest clash, Israel temporarily closed Ben Gurion
Airport, its main transportation hub and point of access to the outside
world, out of concern about a retaliatory attack.
Likewise,
Iran and Hezbollah are not looking to escalate in the near term—both
are still focused on the conflict in Syria. However, Iran’s willingness
to penetrate Israeli airspace with a UAV, build facilities in Syria and
continue attempting to transfer advanced weaponry to Hezbollah in
Lebanon, despite Israeli interdiction efforts, is highly provocative and
increases the risk of miscalculation and war.
Israel has repeatedly demonstrated it will take military action against this threat.
If
war breaks out between Israel on the one hand and Iran and Hezbollah on
the other, it almost certainly will be far larger in scope and more
destructive than the conflict in 2006. Hezbollah has a more capable
military with a much larger rocket and long-range missile force that can
strike deep into Israeli territory.
For
its part, Israel will likely feel compelled to demonstrate a decisive
victory on the battlefield, unlike in 2006, and try to eliminate
Hezbollah’s military capabilities as fully as possible. Hezbollah
strikes against key Israeli infrastructure and population centers would
likely be met with a ferocious air campaign targeting Lebanese vital
infrastructure, along with a wide range of Hezbollah targets. Any
Israeli operation would almost certainly include a robust land campaign
as well.
And
unlike in 2006, this conflict probably would not remain contained to
Lebanon and Israel. Given the Iranian and Hezbollah presence in Syria,
Israeli attacks almost certainly would include targets in Syria as well.
Moreover,
the presence of Russian, Iranian and U.S. forces in close proximity
risks a broadening of the conflict. Israel could formally request U.S.
military assistance in the event it is overwhelmed by Hezbollah rocket
and missile strikes, potentially putting U.S. forces in contact with
both Iranian and Russian ones.
As
the fight against ISIS winds down, the U.S. could work with both the
Israelis and Russians to end advanced weapons transfers to Hezbollah and
secure the withdrawal of Iranian and Hezbollah forces from Syria to
minimize the risk of an escalatory conflict. This could be a significant
challenge; Tehran will likely resist as it seeks to secure its
influence in Syria over the long term and ensure easy access to its
Hezbollah proxy in Lebanon.
At
the same time, Israel cannot tolerate a long-term Iranian military
presence near its northern border, advanced weapons with precision
guidance in Hezbollah’s arsenal, or indigenous missile production
facilities in Lebanon.
While
none of the parties are looking to launch another war at present,
military engagements are likely to continue as long as Iranian and
Hezbollah forces are deployed in Syria and engage in provocative
behavior, increasing the likelihood of a new, destructive war between
Israel, Hezbollah and Iran.
Here are some ideas that can make spending time with your family simple, meaningful and a part of your daily life.
No comments:
Post a Comment