Congress
and millions across the country have cried out to punish Russia over
its meddling and interference in the 2016 election that saw President
Donald Trump rise to the nation’s highest political office.
But,
just days before the Treasury and State Departments have to file
congressionally-mandated reports detailing potential new sanctions,
a
closer look at the issues involved reveal the undertaking goes far
deeper than simply punishing Russia’s economy or payback for election
interference.
Experts explained to Newsweek the
impact current sanctions have already had on Russia’s economy,
particularly in the energy sector, while the Treasury and State
Departments, respectively, detailed the agencies involved and how U.S.
policy will be applied.
The
process is complex, involves European allies, Russian President
Vladimir Putin and his backers and may not really break from policies
the U.S. has adhered to for years.
In July Congress overwhelmingly passed the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (CAATSA). The act, signed by the president in August despite his protest, charged the Trump administration to sanction companies and individuals within Russia’s defense and intelligence sectors.
The
act stipulated Congress could stop Trump from removing sanctions, he
challenged it as unconstitutional, which only led to further accusations
of the billionaire having ties to Russia he has not disclosed.
Those
supposed ties were also exacerbated when the administration missed a
key CAATSA deadline. The administration had until early October to list
the companies and people subject to sanctions but did so three weeks
late.
Eventually,
33 companies linked to Russia’s defense sector and six individuals tied
to the intelligence sector were named. Should companies around the
world do business with those Russian entities and people named, they
could be subject to penalties.
![GettyImages-905988386](https://s.yimg.com/g/images/spaceball.gif)
The
administration has until Monday to submit the reports about possible
new sanctions, and the U.S. Ambassador to Russia, John Huntsman, confirmed earlier this month they would be published by the deadline.
Where the reports stand just before the deadline is somewhat unclear, but the undertaking involves several government agencies.
Treasury
is “actively working” to meet CAATSA’s deadline for the reports on
Russian oligarchs and the potential expansion of sanctions to include
sovereign debt and derivative products, a department spokesperson told Newsweek. Further details or the status of the Treasury reports were not disclosed.
State
is currently working with Treasury’s Office of Terrorism and Financial
Intelligence and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on
the oligarchs report.
Experts
agree the sanctions currently in place against Russia have hurt its
economy and, thus, those oligarchs who support Putin. Russia’s been
subject to sanctions by the U.S., the European Union and others over its
annexation of the Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, for supporting the
separatist war and meddling in elections there, as well as for human
rights abuses under the Magnitsky Act, assistant professor at Harvard
University’s Department on Government Yuval Weber said.
It’s
in dispute exactly how much the sanctions have directly affected
Russia’s economy, but its oil industry has clearly been hit, according
to Weber.
“The
real damage to the Russian economy over previous years is that the
price of oil fell and the economy was (and is) dependent on that,” he
said. “As oil is sold in dollars, fewer dollars bidding for rubles
created a huge decline in the value of the ruble, which in turn really
hurt an economy dependent on imports for everything from food products
to oilfield services.”
Furthermore,
the very threat or possibility of future sanctions can also act as a
deterrent to U.S. businesses, or other firms around the globe, looking
into prospective work with a Russian firm, former undersecretary of
Commerce for Industry and Security and senior Defense Department
official Mario Mancuso said.
“Every
time you set a sanction, the effective impact of that sanction is
actually broader,” Mancuso said. “If you’re in international business
and you read the sanctions regulations and you know that you can do
business with a certain Russia person…you may nevertheless choose not to
undertake the transaction even if it’s permissible because you may
think, ‘wait a second, when will the other shoe drop?’ And the U.S.
government knows that.”
A
State Department official familiar with its efforts on the reports
stressed the U.S.’s sanctions policies toward Russia firmly call for
Putin’s government to back out of Ukraine and to abide by the Minsk
agreements. The 2015 deal was struck between Germany, France, the Ukraine and Russia to maintain a ceasefire and for Ukraine to eventually gain its full sovereignty.
“Our
Russia sanctions policy has been carefully calibrated to incentivize
Russia to fully implement its Minsk commitments, withdraw from occupied
Crimea, and cease malicious cyber intrusions and other malign activities
that threaten our national security,” the State official told Newsweek.
The
official added: “We have been clear that the path to a better
relationship runs through Ukraine, and our policy with respect to
Ukraine has not changed. ”
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said in June of last year the U.S. did not want to be “handcuffed” to the agreement, explaining it was possible the Ukraine and Russia could find some peace outside of the deal’s parameters.
But Tillerson was also in support of sending United Nations peacekeepers to Ukraine to better install the Minsk accords, The Washington Post reported.
But
Russia, too, has used sanctions as a sort of public relations tool to
make it appear as if the U.S. and the West have hindered Russians from
purchasing European goods. The effort is for Putin to retain power or
save face and for his backers to maintain support, Columbia University
political science professor and Russia expert Elise Giuliano said.
“This
has negatively impacted many Russian citizens who consume European
goods,” Giuliano said. “Many Russian citizens don’t even realize that
they can’t buy these goods anymore because of Russia’s decision to
impose sanctions on trade with Europe. They think these are part of the
West's sanctions on Russia. ”
No comments:
Post a Comment